

Here, you can find short content about my projects, founder tips, and world view encapsulated in the articles I wrote for you.
A lot of first-time founders do not fail because they are stupid or because the idea is automatically bad.
They fail because they misunderstand what the job actually is.
They think being a founder means having an idea, choosing a title, building a pitch deck, hiring people, raising money and slowly becoming “the CEO”.
That is not how early-stage startups work.
At the beginning, being a founder is much less glamorous. You are not the boss of a big company. You are the person responsible for turning uncertainty into evidence.
That means you need to build, sell, test, speak to users, get rejected, change your assumptions and keep going when the initial excitement disappears.
This is where many first-time founders struggle.
In Polish, we say słomiany zapał. The English equivalent is “a flash in the pan”.
It describes someone who starts with huge energy, big plans and massive excitement, but loses motivation very quickly once things become difficult, boring or repetitive.
This happens all the time in startups.
At the beginning, everything feels exciting. The idea feels huge. The name sounds cool. The pitch deck looks promising. The LinkedIn update is ready. Everyone is talking about being CEO, CTO, CPO or “building the future”.
Then reality hits.
Users do not reply. Customers do not care. The product has bugs. Investors ask difficult questions. Nobody wants to pay. The market is slower than expected. The team starts losing energy.
That is when you find out who is actually a founder and who only liked the idea of being one.
A real founder does not only show up when the startup feels exciting. A real founder shows up when the work becomes unclear, repetitive and painful.
Some founders try to sell the product while barely understanding what is actually inside it.
That is dangerous.
If you are not inside your own platform, you do not know what users actually experience. You do not know what works, what is broken, what is confusing, what is live, and what is still just an idea.
That is when founders start overselling without even realising it.
They tell users and investors the platform can do things it cannot really do yet. They make promises based on assumptions, not reality. They speak with confidence because they like the story, but they are disconnected from the actual product.
Then anxiety kicks in.
Why? Because the label they put on themselves - founder, expert, operator, builder - suddenly feels at risk. Someone asks a basic product question, a user exposes a gap, or an investor challenges the workflow, and the whole image starts shaking.
But that is self-inflicted.
If you build a platform, you need to use it. You need to know the onboarding, the core workflow, the limits, the bugs and the value moments. Early on, this is always the founder’s job.
You cannot outsource product understanding.
Do not just sell the platform. Be inside it, use it, understand it, and then sell what is actually real.
One of the biggest traps for first-time founders is making the startup too personal.
The company becomes part of their identity. The idea becomes something they need to defend. Feedback starts to feel like criticism, a weak feature feels embarrassing, and a pivot feels like admitting they were wrong.
That is dangerous, because once you inject yourself too deeply into the startup, you stop listening properly. Instead of testing the idea, you start protecting it. Instead of asking why users do not care, you start explaining why they “do not get it”. Instead of improving the product, you protect your ego.
Here is the uncomfortable truth: users do not care about you as much as you think.
They do not care how much you love the idea, how long you spent building it, how clever the architecture is, or how convinced you are that the market “should” want it. They care about themselves. They care whether your product helps them save time, work faster, make more money, reduce risk, remove pain, or look better in their job.
That is the equation. The user is not buying your identity. They are buying a better outcome.
This is why founders need to listen and adapt quickly. If users are confused, the product is unclear. If users do not convert, the value is not strong enough. If users keep asking for something else, maybe the real opportunity is not where you thought it was.
That does not mean every user is right, but the market is always giving you signals. Your job is to separate noise from signal and then adapt.
The worst thing you can do is build a startup around your ego. That is how founders ignore feedback, resist pivots, overbuild features nobody wants and keep pushing a version of the product the market has already rejected.
A startup is not a monument to your original idea. It is a learning machine.
You are not there to prove you were right from day one. You are there to discover what actually works.
The best founders care deeply, but they stay flexible. They listen to users, watch behaviour, follow the evidence and change direction when the market tells them to.
Do not make the startup about you. Make it about the problem, the user and the outcome.
First-time founders often try to hire too early.
Hiring makes the startup feel more serious. It gives the illusion of progress. You can say, “We are building a team,” which sounds much better than, “We still do not know if customers care.”
But hiring without a clear reason creates problems.
Now you have payroll, management, communication overhead, expectations and pressure. You also risk delegating work before you properly understand what the work even is.
Before hiring anyone, ask:
At the early stage, being small is not a weakness. It can be an advantage.
A small founder-led team can move fast, learn quickly and avoid unnecessary complexity. A bloated team with unclear responsibilities just burns money and slows everything down.
There are things early-stage founders must do themselves.
You cannot outsource understanding the customer. You cannot delegate the first sales conversations. You cannot hide behind agencies, employees or contractors before you understand the market.
At the beginning, the founder needs to be close to the truth.
That means speaking to users directly, handling objections, watching how people react to the product, understanding why they do not buy and learning what they actually value.
If you delegate that too early, you lose the signal.
You might get reports, summaries and dashboards, but you will not feel the pain directly. And feeling the pain matters.
When a user is confused, you need to hear it. When a customer says, “I would not pay for this,” you need to understand why. When the market rejects your idea, you need to know whether the problem is the product, pricing, positioning, timing or the market itself.
The founder’s job is not to sit above the learning process.
The founder’s job is to be inside it.
This is another classic mistake.
A founder says:
“I know this market.”
“I worked in this industry.”
“I am an expert.”
“I know what users need.”
Maybe you do. But maybe you only know your version of the market.
There is a big difference between having domain knowledge and understanding what users will actually use, pay for and adopt right now.
Experts can still be wrong. Sometimes they are more wrong because they carry strong assumptions from the past.
Users do not care how clever the idea is. They care whether it solves a real problem in their current workflow.
Even if you are an expert, you still need to validate:
The market does not reward founders for being right in theory.
It rewards founders for solving something people actually care about.
A startup is not an art project.
You are not building just to express yourself. You are building something that needs to survive in the market.
First-time founders often fall in love with the original idea too early. They keep adding features, polishing the design, rewriting copy, changing the name, adjusting the logo and building things nobody asked for.
Meanwhile, the market is silent.
No signups. No sales. No urgency. No real pull.
That silence is feedback.
The painful truth is that the market may not want the product in the way you imagined it. The customer may care about a smaller problem. The real value may be hidden in one feature you thought was secondary. The buyer may be different from the user you originally targeted.
Your job is not to defend the first version of the idea forever.
Your job is to find the version that the market actually wants.
Being contrarian can be powerful, but being contrarian without evidence is just stubbornness.
Some founders go against the market, trends and customer behaviour because they believe they know better. They ignore where budgets are moving. They ignore how people are already changing their workflows. They ignore new technology shifts. They ignore regulation, pricing pressure or distribution changes.
Then they are surprised when the market does not respond.
You do not need to chase every trend. Most trends are noise.
But you do need to understand the direction of travel.
If the market is moving toward AI, automation, self-serve tools, embedded workflows, lower-cost solutions or faster decision-making, you cannot build as if the world has not changed.
A good founder asks:
The goal is not to blindly follow the market.
The goal is to avoid building against reality.
Some founders chase ideas because they sound exciting, not because they are the right person to build them.
That is risky.
If you have no domain knowledge, no network, no customer access, no technical advantage and no unfair insight, why should you win?
This does not mean you can never enter a new market. You can. But you need to be honest about what you do not know.
If you are building outside your expertise, you need to compensate with serious research, domain experts, customer interviews, advisors, fast learning and a clear reason why you can build a better solution than people already inside the market.
Founder-market fit matters.
The best founders often have some unfair connection to the problem. They have experienced it, worked in the industry, understand the workflow, know the customer or can access buyers faster than others.
Without that, you may not be building your startup.
You may be building someone else’s better idea, badly.
Startups need realism.
But realism is not the same as constant negativity.
Some founders find a problem in every solution. Every idea is too hard. Every customer is wrong. Every investor is unfair. Every team member is not good enough. Every obstacle becomes proof that the startup cannot work.
That energy spreads.
A founder sets the emotional tone of the company. If the founder is always negative, the team becomes slower, more defensive and less creative.
Good founders are not delusional. They see the problems clearly. But they keep moving anyway.
Instead of saying, “This will never work,” they ask:
That is the difference.
A negative founder drains energy.
A realistic founder channels it.
First-time founders often stay very busy doing things that feel productive but do not actually move the business forward.
They redesign the logo. Rewrite the pitch deck. Apply to every accelerator. Plan future hires. Build features nobody requested. Have endless strategy calls. Post about the startup instead of selling.
It all feels like progress.
But real progress is usually much simpler.
Are users talking to you? Are customers testing the product? Is anyone paying? Are sales conversations getting clearer? Is retention improving? Is the product solving a sharper problem than last month?
If not, you may just be busy.
Busy is not the same as building.
A lot of founders confuse building with progress.
They keep adding features, dashboards, workflows, settings and integrations because there is always “one more thing” they think they need before showing the product to anyone.
“We need this before we send it.”
“The product is not ready yet.”
“Users will need this.”
Most of the time, this is not strategy. It is fear dressed up as product thinking.
At the beginning, your job is not to build the perfect product. Your job is to find one painful problem that users care about enough to test, change behaviour, introduce internally or eventually pay for.
Building feels safe. Talking to users, selling and hearing rejection does not. That is why founders hide behind product work. But more features do not reduce market risk. They often increase it, because you may spend weeks building around the wrong assumption.
This is why early users and design partners matter. They show you what is useful, what is confusing, what they would ignore, and where the real pain actually sits.
Being an expert does not save you here. Having experienced the problem yourself is only a starting point. It is not proof that users want your workflow, your feature list or your product.
The market is proof. Users are proof. Payment is proof. Repeated behaviour is proof.
A good early product should be just good enough to test the core value. If the problem is painful, users will tolerate rough edges and tell you what matters.
The lesson is simple: do not build more to avoid the truth. Find one painful problem, test it with real users, and let the market show you what to build next.
Do not run away from the work that teaches you the truth.
The truth is in customer conversations, sales calls, rejection, usage data, payment behaviour and honest feedback.
If you delegate that too early, ignore it, or pretend you know better, you will build in the dark.
First-time founders often want the exciting parts of startup life: the idea, the title, the launch, the fundraising, the team and the public identity.
But companies are built in the less glamorous parts.
The awkward customer calls. The rejected demos. The messy MVP. The difficult feedback. The boring follow-ups. The constant iteration.
The founder who survives is not the one with the biggest initial excitement. It is the one who keeps going after the excitement fades.
Do not be a flash in the pan.
Do not build a startup just to update LinkedIn.
Do not hire to avoid the work.
Do not outsource the learning.
Do not confuse yourself with the company.
Do not pretend you know better than the user.
Build close to the customer, stay honest with yourself and let the market tell you what is real.


